Benefits of Windows servers over Linux servers In general, Windows servers are more robust systems. With a more cohesive, polished approach than Linux, these servers are generally far more user friendly, reliable, and low-maintenance than their less widely used counterparts.
This begs the query “Why Linux server is better than Windows Server?”
One thought is that free and Open Source The first and foremost reason why linux servers are way ahead than the Windows servers are there completely free and available as open source software. By open source means, you can easily see the code available that was used for creating the Linux Kernel and also modify the code to fix any bugs etc.
One particularly strong advantage Windows has over Linux is its high performance web application framework, ASP. NET, whose most current version is also compatible with Linux. The applications Share, pointand Exchange, which aid in communication and make working on a project much easier, are still exclusive to Microsoft.
One of the next things we asked ourselves was can I use a Linux server with Windows applications?
Using a Linux server with Windows applications is possible, but an extra layer of work to interface between the open-source technology and Windows for-profit technology will be required. Linux and open-source software generally use fewer resources, making the system more efficient.
This begs the query “Is Windows Server a good operating system for your business?”
While Windows Server is more expensive than running Linux due to licensing costs, it can be a good operating system option depending on what software and applications a business is powered on.
Why should I use GNU/Linux?
However, in contrast, Linux is completely an open source project. You can have a look at the source code of a Linux OS, which is a plus. I know, most people don’t care about this openness of Linux, but to me, this is the most important feature of using GNU/Linux.
Why is windows server so expensive?
Everything that goes into a server — from the the case itself to the power supply to the hard drive — tends to be more expensive than desktop computer parts. Why is this? Servers operate under more stressful conditions than consumer PCs and are expected to be more reliable, so server-grade parts are built to tougher standards.
We discovered again though the reason the OS is more expensive than say buying Mac. OS (OSX previously) is that microsoft is a software company first and their profits come from software sales both to users and to oems. Unlike Apple they don’t have heavily marked up computers to charge less for their operating system or even to offer the OS for free .
That comes with no storage out of the box. A red HDD comes in at an introductory cost of $70 for 1TB. You will, however, likely want to start at the 3TB price range, which can cost between $110 and $150 offering as much as 3x the space for only double the price . Final Windows Server price out of the box: $470-$520.
Businesses need hardware that can withstand the needs of the organization. These needs include everything from optimal performance requirements like processing speeds for software, to storage demands for high-volumes of important or sensitive data, to concurrent requests from users.
Do people still use Windows Server 2003?
The number of web-facing computers running Windows Server 2003 has been on a gradual decline since its peak usage in 2011, but many servers are still using it. Hundreds of thousands of computers are still using the Windows Server 2003 operating system – despite it no longer being patched against hacks.
I discovered the end of support means the OS no longer receives patches against viruses, spyware and other malware that might seek to exploit the system. The US Computer Emergency Readiness Team warns that those running Windows Server 2003 risk “loss of confidentiality, integrity, and or availability of data, system resources and business assets”.
While I was researching we ran into the inquiry “Does NatWest still support Microsoft Office 2003?”.
Such a deal was recently struck by the US Navy, which agreed to pay at least $9m to Microsoft to provide ongoing support for Windows XP, Office 2003, Exchange 2003 and Server 2003. A spokesman for RBS said Nat. West is also covered by a custom support deal with Microsoft that began in March this year.
Does Windows Server 2003 pose a security risk to financial firms?
Firms without such a custom support deal in place that use Windows Server 2003 to serve sites that handle financial information could be in breach of data security standards, according to Netcraft – which carries out security testing and assessments for companies.